Tag Archive | "credit-card"

Marqeta provides technology behind the Facebook Card, announces $14M in funding

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


marqeta-facebook-cardCommerce and payments platform Marqeta today announced that it is the company providing the technology behind the Facebook Card, a gift card that can hold balances for a number of retailers or restaurants simultaneously.

Marqeta had agreed with Facebook not to disclose this until now. The announcement came as part of news about Marqeta’s latest round of funding: a $14 million Series B from Greylock IL, Granite Ventures, Commerce Ventures and a number of new angel and strategic investors.

The company’s +M Platform connects online and offline commerce through prepaid loyalty programs, similar to the Starbucks Card. It also allows prepaid amounts from multiple merchants, which is what Facebook is taking advantage of for its card. Facebook Card is a resusable gift card that can be loaded with balances for different businesses when a user’s friends buy them gifts through the social network.

facebook-card-gifts

When Facebook Card launched in January, Target, Jamba Juice, Olive Garden and Sephora were the only partners, making it not very compelling. It has since added Walgreens, Burger King, Outback Steakhouse and Staples — still quite limited and user awareness still seems to be very low. We haven’t seen Facebook make any efforts to advertise this offering, though it has been promoting Gifts overall across the platform.

In general, Gifts have been slow to take off, in part because of confusion about what Gifts are. Some users, remembering Facebook’s virtual gift shop from a few years ago, don’t realize the new Gifts are actual physical and digital goods. Others are skeptical because they think Gifts are a third-party app, not something from Facebook. Still others might not be using the product because they feel Facebook is not personal enough to send friends and loved ones presents through, or they’re concerned about providing their credit card information to the social network.

Until Facebook can better address users’ concerns and convey the benefits of Gifts — users don’t need to know a friend’s address, they can share the Gift on a friend’s wall or keep it private, payment information is secure — the product is unlikely to come into widespread use. If it can position it as a convenient but intimate way to show someone they care, then Gifts and Facebook Card might start to fulfill their potential as new stream of revenue for the company and shape commerce like Marqeta and Facebook seem to intend.

Article courtesy of Inside Facebook

Death By A Thousand Cuts? Google Wallet’s Plan To Take On PayPal Leverages Chrome, Android, Google+, Gmail & More

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


googlewallet

Flying under the radar amid a flurry of announcements from today’s Google I/O developer conference is the bigger news of how Google is stepping up its efforts to compete with online payment giants with a revamped checkout process for the web, mobile web, within mobile applications running on Android, and more.

It’s a proposed death to PayPal by a thousand cuts, leveraging everything from Chrome to Android and even Gmail. What Google hasn’t quite worked out yet is how all this will tie together in the long run, but you can see the plan beginning to form.

#1: Google Wallet On The Web: Storing Payment Credentials In Chrome

Let’s start with the browser, the de facto home for online shopping.

It’s not news that the checkout experience is broken. Shopping cart abandonment is one of the biggest pain points for today’s merchants, mainly because their websites have traditionally offered only cumbersome and tedious forms for shoppers to fill out in order to make a purchase.

As noted during today’s keynote, one of the hardest things you can do on the web is try to buy something. The process takes around 21 steps, the company explained. Of course, Google is exaggerating here a bit – billing and shipping details are usually the same, but Google counted each field (street, zip, etc.) twice.

That being said, things are even worse on mobile. Google notes that shopping cart abandonment on mobile devices is now an outrageous 97 percent. Again, that seems high (here’s the source for that figure), but the trend Google is illustrating with these slightly puffed up figures is not.

For comparison’s sake, Monetate’s data put global cart abandonment at around 82 percent as of Q4 2012. The company has been seeing increases in cart abandonment – which had been around 60 percent over the past several years – due to an increased number of shoppers doing research on mobile phones and other devices. As they reach the point of checking out on mobile, they’re now more likely to give up and move on because of the increased difficulty of the experience on mobile’s small screen, combined with retailers’ failure to roll out mobile-optimized experiences even as percentages of mobile shoppers continue to grow at record rates.

A number of startups have been attacking this challenge in various forms – mobile apps featuring universal carts, native m-commerce storefronts, mobile optimized payment flows, one-click mobile payments, in-stream payments, and more.

Google’s plan?

Leverage Chrome.

Chrome is already the world’s most popular browser, with more than 750 million monthly active users today, up from 450 million just a year ago. Now it will begin baking in a speedier checkout experience into its browser by syncing your billing information and other details within Chrome.

What that means is that, in the future, when you visit a website using the Chrome browser, including the Chrome mobile browser, you’ll automatically be offered up a prompt with your billing profiles. Chrome can then use autocomplete functionality to fill in information for you like your address, zip code, credit card info and more.

This functionality is being introduced via a new requestAutocomplete API, which Google describes here as “an aspiring web standard that will allow users to bypass pages of form fields with an imperative API for requesting details the browser knows.”

Says Google, this drops the checkout process from 21 steps to just 3.

Overall, it’s a worthy attempt at solving the problem with online checkout, but it still suffers from some potential obstacles to broader adoption: website owners will have to implement the functionality (the API) on their end, and unless this “aspiring” web standard becomes an “actual” web standard supported by all browsers, its impact would be limited.

This feature is still in its early days, but it’s designed to be open. Presumably, the company would still want to at least offer support for payment information retrieved from users’ Google Wallet accounts, if not actually require it. (Theoretically, payment info could just be saved directly in Chrome or any other browser without the need for a Wallet account.)

#2 Google Wallet On The Web (Um, Again): Google Wallet API

While the above describes what will first be a Chrome-only feature to start, Google Wallet has already found a way to support the web and mobile web through more traditional means.

In addition to supporting online checkout through Wallet, last fall, the company launched a Google Wallet API which allows e-commerce website owners to support checkout via Google Wallet on mobile devices. This is independent of the browser or mobile operating system however, making it more like an alternative to the PayPal button.

It’s a bit confusing because with the new Chrome autocomplete functionality, it seems there will be some overlap between the two. Site owners would end up implementing two APIs to be fully supportive of Google users: one to speed up checkout through automated form filling in Chrome (likely pulling payment credentials from a user’s Google Wallet), and another if they wanted a Google Wallet button on their site which users could click to instead be walked through the Google Wallet checkout flow.

Which is better? How will these two tie together? For now, Google can’t say, only noting that it’s still the “early days” for the Chrome autocomplete API and it’s probable that Google Wallet will be supported in some way.

But nothing is definite yet.

It’s a perfect example indicative of how Google needs to bring its separate teams together in order to tell a more cohesive story about payments. Rumor has it, the Wallet team has been too “siloed,” which has caused some issues. (See part #5 below, for example).

#3 Going Wallet On Android: Paid Apps, In-App Purchases & Now, the Google Wallet Instant Buy Android API

Android is the world’s most popular mobile operating system, so it only makes sense for Google to take advantage of that fact to pull in more users’ payment information. After all, today’s users are already using Google Wallet to purchase paid applications for Android devices as well as in-app purchases, so why not extend Wallet to support purchases of physical goods, too?

That’s just what Google did.

With today’s new Google Wallet Instant Buy Android API, merchants and developers selling physical goods and services (as opposed to virtual goods, like those sold in mobile games), can now offer 2-click checkout to their customers.

At launch, the company has signed on a number of new partners, including Airbnb, Booking.comExpediaFancy, GoPago live POSNFC Task Launcher, Priceline,
Rue La LaTabbedoutUber, and Wrapp.

The service ties in also with Google+, allowing users to register and sign in to the apps, similar to Facebook Connect, and then tap to checkout without the need to enter in billing or shipping information.

#4: Google Wallet in Gmail: “Attach” Money

Another vector in the fight to topple PayPal is person-to-person payments – like paying the babysitter, or paying your dad the money you borrowed, for example. Digitally savvy folks today still largely turn to PayPal to make this happen.

Google’s plan here?

Leverage Gmail.

It’s simple and ingenious really. The familiar email “attachment” icon has just become another onboarding experience for Google Wallet. With the Gmail update, the service’s 425 million+ users can hover over the attachment paperclip icon, then click the $ icon in order to “attach money” to their message.

Of course, you’ll need a Google Wallet account first.

For now, the feature is only available in the desktop version of Gmail, but it will certainly come to mobile in time.

#5 Google Wallet In Real World? (What’s Plan B If NFC Never Wins?)

The only area where Google is lacking a solid strategy is in real world payments – an area where competitor PayPal has been ramping up quickly in recent months. PayPal has been working with nearly two-dozen nationwide retail chains, including Home Depot, Jamba Juice and more, to be integrated into their point-of-sale systems. It has separately announced integrations with point-of-sale and hardware makers like NCR, gas station and convenience store-focused Gilbarco Veeder-Root’s point-of-sale system, coin-counting kiosk maker Coinstar, and more.

Google has been trudging along with its NFC-based Google Wallet app – an app using technology whose broader adoption has been slow to pick up here in the U.S., in part due to a lack of support from Apple, as well as swirling questions as to how much of an improvement tapping your phone at point-of-sale really has over a card swipe in the long run.

Google had plans to launch a plastic “universal” credit card which would allow users to switch between their preferred payment methods on the fly while still using a physical card at point-of-sale. For whatever reason, the company scrapped those plans just ahead of Google I/O.

Combined, all of the above areas on their own can’t be considered a PayPal killer by any means. But as they become more tightly integrated over time (assuming Google can get its teams together to focus on the bigger picture beyond their own product’s development and focus on the global stage), you can see a viable threat to PayPal starting to shape up.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Squarekey Brings Premium Fashion Brands To India’s Burgeoning Mass Of Online Shoppers

Tags: , , , , , , ,


02

With India’s annual GDP growth of about 5 to 6 percent per year, a new wave of affluent consumers is coming. While there have been e-commerce successes like Flipkart, a handful of local startups are targeting the upper-end of the market.

Squarekey is a startup that brings high-end fashion brands to India for the same prices as ones that a consumer would pay in the West.

“Retail is stagnating the Western world,” said founder Avantika Daing. “The growth story is now in markets in India. We’re really addressing a big unmet consumer need. Our core base will include about 300 million users by 2015. Those are the potential users — the aspirational class that spans from the middle class to the upper-middle class.”

The site offers clothes from about 65 brands including Nanette Lepore, Nicole Miller, BCBG Max Azria and Ben Sherman. While the site only opened last fall and Daing declined to share volume numbers, she did say that sales were growing by 30 percent month-over-month. Their average price point is around $175.

India has strict regulations about allowing in “multi-brand” stores, or ones that offer multiple clothing brands. At the same time, individual clothing brands may not be at the point where they’re willing take the financial risk of entering the Indian market.

“A Bloomingdale’s or a Barney’s cannot enter india with the current regulatory environment,” she said. “Single brands are permitted in India. There are some foreign direct investment nuances around minority and majority shareholders, but you do need a local partner.”

She said brands give Squarekey access to their current season inventory, and they take care of everything from fulfillment to the last-mile delivery. They can drop ship to the first-tier cities in India within a few days for most of their goods, but other pieces that are flown in from the U.S. may take 10 business days.

Over the last few years, a slightly older generation of e=commerce companies has figured out the logistical hurdles of delivering goods to consumers in the major cities. Plus, credit card penetration is improving.

“Things like credit card usage are issues of yesterday,” Daing said. “The marketplace has evolved and an ecosystem of small and large e-commerce players have helped make barriers disappear.”

She adds that Squarekey doesn’t take on inventory risk by buying merchandise upfront.

“For the first six months, we did take inventory risk just to prove ourselves out,” she said. “It was just a kind of good faith move to prove to brands that we were creating this compliant and trustworthy platform.”

But now, Squarekey pre-stocks from clothing in India after taking products on consignment from the brands. They also let Indian shoppers buy pre-season clothing if they’re willing to wait six to eight weeks.

With Squarekey’s model, Daing says she’s not playing the discount game that has made other Indian e-commerce startups less profitable. Local investors have rationalized a bit over the last year, according to a survey from one of Squarekey’s backers, the Indian startup accelerator GSF India.

“What happened last year was that we had a lot of your Amazon-like business models come up in India, then a lot of me-too Gilt Groupe-like business models. One questions the sustainability of the latter model.”

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Bought My Mother’s Day Flowers With Affirm, And Here’s What It Was Like

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


photo

My parents have yet to receive their Christmas gift. Because they are avid skiers, I bought them gift cards to Heavenly Mountain last December, and because of some issue with either the ZIP code or security code on my credit card, my charge keeps getting rejected. I have tried five different cards.

I have called AmEx. I’m about to call Chase since I just got a new card, and sit there and go through the transaction step by step with them to make sure there’s not some sort of security thing on my card’s side preventing the transaction from going through. I’m going to do that once I finish this post. Why won’t you let me give you my money, AmEx?

My mom did, however, receive her Mother’s Day gift yesterday, and the payment experience was exactly the opposite of the middle-class problem described above. That’s because I challenged myself to use Max Levchin’s new startup, Affirm, as a payment method.

Optimized for mobile, Affirm lets you pay without a credit card via phone in literally two taps (that’s their marketing pitch, in case that’s not obvious). It “loans” you the money with no fee, then gives you 30 days interest-free to pay it back. Affirm monetizes by charging a fee to merchants in return for guaranteeing payments through its social media-enabled risk assessment.

Right now the service is only available if you’re buying something from 1-800-Flowers, which is fitting. I don’t know about you, but lots of people are happy to pay $20 more for the convenience of not having to call a random florist by your mom’s house and pay by credit card over the phone during normal business hours.

Pro tip: You can always get cheaper flowers by calling a local florist, but I prefer to do my parent gift shopping at 1 a.m. on my cell phone in bed so …

“Given 1-800-FLOWERS.COM’s culture of innovation, we are always looking for innovative experiences to test and learn [!],” 1-800-Flowers head of VP of Mobile and Social Amit Shah told me on why they chose to be Affirm’s guinea pig during their high season. “This is an important focus for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM as we have been in the mobile space for more than five years — serving a rapidly increasing number of our customers who are using our mobile site and apps to send gifts every day.”

They’re on to me.

The real simple Affirm/1-800-Flowers integration lets you choose “Affirm Express Checkout” as one of the payment methods when buying your “Fields Of Europe ™ For Mom Large” and then asks you to log in with Facebook or Gmail to your Affirm account to complete the order. No credit card numbers, no security codes, no phone calls to customer service. Hallelujah.

Because it is born mobile, Affirm then texts you that you’ve completed your order, and you have about a month to log back in to Affirm to pay for your blossoms. I forgot about it after I did it, and about a week later Affirm emailed me to remind me that I hadn’t paid. So I did. Right then.

“It’s hard to build something really convenient,” Levchin told me in an interview about the startup, below. Though he wouldn’t confirm the rumors, we’re hearing that in addition to Levchin himself through HVF, a lot of the PayPal mafia (i.e. Levchin’s homies) went in on the company’s $3m-$5m seed round, namely Peter Thiel and David Sacks. Competitors include Signifyd and Klarna.

Now it sucks that Affirm wouldn’t let me use a promo code to buy my overpriced bouquet, especially since overeager Google Wallet desperately wants to pay me $10 just to try it, but overall Affirm was worth it. (Levchin says that the Promo Code feature is coming in a new release.) Other than that, I wish that all online checkouts were this painless — This kind of friction removal has the potential to greatly expand the e-commerce market, bridge online to offline payments and engender trust among users.

Are you there AmEx? It’s me, Alexia.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

CardFlight Partners With Stripe And Launches SDK To Become The ‘Stripe Of Real-World Payments’

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


CardFlight-large-white-bk

For developers who wish to introduce payment services through their website or mobile apps, there are any number of payment processors available. Companies like Stripe offer up APIs which help developers quickly integrate payments into their applications, without having to build out non-core functionality themselves.

But what about developers who want to be able to take payments directly, like in real-life? On that front, the options are much more limited. While Square and PayPal and Intuit have done a good job of lining up small businesses to use its card reader and Register point-of-sale system, those customers are stuck using the platform provided to them. Those who wish to develop their own custom or branded solutions are out of luck when it comes to taking real-world payments.

Enter CardFlight, which is launching with an encrypted, Square-like card reader of its own, as well as an SDK and APIs that will allow developers to create apps and take “card-present” payments on their mobile apps. Those apps can then securely be used to swipe cards, and have payments appear in their existing merchant accounts.

CardFlight CEO Derek Webster tells me that, despite the focus on e-commerce and mobile commerce applications, about 90 percent of credit card transactions still happen with a swipe. With that in mind, the company is hoping to make it easier for developers to build apps and for businesses to use apps with so-called card-present transactions. To do so, they need only add a few lines of code to those apps.

There’s also the CardFlight dongle, which is just like other credit-card dongles provided by Square, or PayPal, or Intuit. It’s encrypted, and safe and secure and PCI-compliant and all that.

The developer toolset is processor-agnostic, which lets developers pick from a whole bunch of existing merchant accounts. And, it’s integrated with Stripe to enable developers who use Stripe for their stored credit card payments to also accept payments from people who wanna swipe their cards.

All of that would allow a chain restaurant, for instance, to build its own applications and integrated POS systems. Or for event organizers to build (non-Eventbrite) apps for selling tickets at the door to their local venues. Or for CRM apps to enable card payments for in-person sales applications. Or other stuff like that. Really, the possibilities are kind of endless.

CardFlight is now entering into private beta, with a number of developers already ready to start using its SDK in building their apps. Wanna be one of them? Go here.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

TabbedOut Scores Deal With Point-Of-Sale Maker, Will Allow Customers To Pay Their Restaurant Or Bar Tab Via Their Phone At 10,000 Locations

Tags: , , , , , , ,


TabbedOutLogo

Because waiting for the check stinks. Tabbedout, a startup backed by $5.75 million from NEA and others, has been developing a platform that allows bar and restaurant customers to pay for their tab using their smartphone. Today, the company is announcing a partnership with Point-of-Sale (POS) system maker Harbortouch which will allow it to sizably increase its footprint in the space.

The two companies have joined forces to deliver an integrated solution that’s being installed on all the new Harbortouch Hospitality POS deployments in the future, as well as integrated into existing terminals. The vendor has a presence in over 10,000 locations across the U.S.

Though to the consumer, it may seem like it should be simple enough to just start paying for things in the offline world with your phone, there’s a reason why no entity has yet to establish itself as a leading mobile wallet application yet. The reality is that moving payment processing from credit cards to apps and/or chipsets is actually fairly challenging, and that situation is not helped by the fragmented ecosystems of handheld devices and their various mobile operating system versions.

And then there’s all those point-of-sale systems to think of. To reach TabbedOut’s target market, it’s a tough path. There are a number of POS systems in use today, and they’re often legacy technology. In order to reach these customers, TabbedOut has had to focus on integrations. It has both partnered and integrated with Micros, Aloha, Future, Focus, Dinerware, Digital Dining, and Jumpware over the past couple of years.

TabbedOut has also had to take a careful approach to security, given it’s dealing with customers’ payment information. Though arguably technology-based solutions tend to be more secure than physically handing over your credit card to the poor college student taking your order, that’s not how the average American perceives the situation.

Personal and financial data within TabbedOut’s mobile apps is securely encrypted on device, as opposed to the company’s servers, and is locked under passphrase protection. Restaurant patrons give their server a code the app displays, then they order normally. Because of the POS integrations, when customers are ready to leave, they simply have to launch the app and pay their bill. The app also makes it easy to split a check among friends, and allows the restaurant to target its customers with personalized offers.

When TabbedOut completed its Series A in May 2011, it had 200 restaurants in 90 cities. Prior to the agreement with Harbortouch, it had 1,100 merchants on the platform, and now it will have 10,000. However, TabbedOut today declined to provide details as to how broadly deployed its technology is today, in terms of customers using the system, or to what extent its prior partnerships have allowed it to expand its footprint.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

With $7.5M From Redpoint, Bill Campbell & Others, Curious Launches A Marketplace For Life-Long Learning

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


curious2

With the growing demand for video-based online education, Curious.com is joining the crowd today with a marketplace that aims help students and teachers connect around a range of subjects, from pipe soldering and salsa dancing to jewelry making and knife sharpening.

With 10K learners logging 150K sessions during its five month private beta, Curious launches today with hundreds of short, video-based lessons for people who want to learn a new skill or rekindle a favorite hobby. Founded by former Homestead founder and CEO Justin Kitch, who sold his company to Intuit for $170 million, Curious is taking a page out of Udemy’s book by not only offering learning content to students but by allowing teachers to market, share and monetize their lessons and engage with new students.

To support its launch, the company has raised $7.5 million in Series A financing from Redpoint Ventures, former Apple Chairman Bill Campbell and Jesse Rogers, including a personal investment of $500K from Kitch.

Kitch tells us that there are millions of teachers out there who are itching to share their expertise with the world but don’t have access to the tools or marketing skills to bring their knowledge online. The Web today, he says, is littered with low-quality learning content delivered in static ways that fail to keep students engaged.

With Curious, Kitch wants to make online learning more digestible and accessible to the average Web surfer, while helping wanna-be teachers make a buck or two on the side by helping them, say, learn how to brew a tasty pilsener. The platform allows teachers to sign up for free and use the site’s “lesson Builder” to design, publish and market their own lessons in under an hour.

Teachers can link their related lessons and track how many views their lessons collect, while enabling learners to submit projects they drum up during class and create “Curious Cards” to share their achievements with the world. Through its comment and messaging system, Curious allows teachers to work with students individually, while answering their questions, reviewing projects and providing speedy feedback.

While there are a ton of online lesson platforms out there, from Khan Academy and Skillshare to Udemy, CreativeLive and Lynda.com, Curious is looking to set itself apart by keeping videos short and serving content in bite-sized, episodic chunks. Students can engage with the content on their own time, as Curious eschews the traditional scheduling approach, opting for convenience and immediacy.

Learners can stop lessons whenever they want, share projects during the process or at the end of the lesson and post questions to the community or directly to teachers. At launch, the site offers more than 500 lessons from over 100 professional teachers, curated by Curious’ staff of educators and video experts.

The startup wants to help its teachers monetize their content, but it’s also looking to keep things inexpensive at the outset, so the most lessons will cost is a few dollars. Teachers can offer their lessons for free, or for a few bucks a pop.

In another twist for video-based education, Curious offers its own micropayment system and currency, called “Curious Coins,” which allow learners to securely purchase premium lessons without having to swipe their credit card 15 times.

Another nifty feature which helps it stand out from the crowd is Curious internally-developed media player, which breaks each video up into short 30 or 60 second intervals. Each section is watermarked, which allow attachments to surface at the appropriate interval and makes it easy to flip back and forth between sections. Comments pile up below the videos in a river, while students enrolled in Curious have the ability to view comments by section.

Curious isn’t yet ready to provide its own studios for teachers, so educators have to provide their own video, but the platform takes care of everything else. The Lesson Builder helps teachers split their lessons into sections, add attachments and text and publish. Curious’ team is actively perusing the Web to find the best teachers in any given subject, wherever they live, inviting them to the platform if they pass muster.

Curious takes the standard 30 percent for all lesson sales in its marketplace, although that could be subject to change going forward.

To celebrate its public launch, the startup is offering new learners $20 of free Curious Coins. For more, find Curious at home here.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Koupah Does Tablet-Based Point-Of-Sale, But Also Zaps Credit Card Transaction Fees

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Koupa2

TechCrunch Disrupt NY 2013 Startup Alley company Koupah is a fresh take on the tablet-based point-of-sale space, which is growing in popularity among SMBs that want a solution that’s flexible, extensible and less expensive than legacy POS-specific hardware systems. Koupah takes the model a step further by offsetting some or all credit card transaction fees with advertising.

The system works by tracking customers and keeping a record of them across Koupah systems, complete with purchase history and shopping preferences, to help create profiles that can be used to create personalized ads and offers for repeat shoppers. Those promotions will be printed directly on a customer’s bill, and each is designed to target that customer specifically, making for a greater chance it’ll become an actual conversion. The commission that Koupah takes in for displaying those ads is then used to offset the 2.69 percent fee that credit card processors put on credit payments.

The Koupah system is opt-in, making users tap their devices to activate the profile. It can connect to a second, smaller device on the outward-facing portion of the Koupah terminal to check a user in and bring up their profile, which could include order history, or even favorite orders for faster ordering. Koupah is founded by David Merel who previously built the Social Passport mobile app, a rewards platform that uses NFC and QR codes to track commerce behavior and provide tailored rewards. Social Passport is a key integration for Koupah’s customer profile features.

Where Koupah tries to advertise to offset fees, other players in the space like Revel have turned to LevelUp to go transaction-fee-free for its merchants. That system has different downsides, however, since it requires that customers have a LevelUp account for it to work to begin with. Whereas Revel charges for its hardware, Koupah is giving away three terminals per merchant for free, as well as a cash drawer and receipt printer. It makes its money via advertising opportunities  and through a 3-cent-per-transaction rate on all purchases to offset hardware and technical support costs.

Merel said in an interview that the system also supports purchases from mobile devices, delivery orders, take-out and dine-in, so it’s intended as a complete replacement for existing POS and retail/restaurant backends, complete with an analytics platform. The New York-based startup is accepting reservations now for merchants interested in trying it in-store.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Bidzy Launches As An E-Commerce Platform At Disrupt NY For Local Services Firms To Grab New Customers, One Last-Minute Bid At A Time

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Bidzy logo horizontal

Bidzy, a new platform for connecting local services businesses with customers who need the service they offer in the next few hours, is launching at Disrupt NY 2013 today. Like the best ideas, Bidzy’s premise is simple: allow the customer to specify exactly what they want and the amount they are willing to pay and then let the individual businesses decide if they’re happy to take on a spot of last-minute work on those terms. Job done. Or, rather, credit card charged.

Bidzy’s platform sits in the middle, connecting the right customers to the right local services and holding payment until the work is completed – much like TaskRabbit hooks up consumers with time/skills to offer to other consumers (c2c) who have a task that needs doing. Except Bidzy’s focus is solely c2b – with its twist being that it allows customers to specify what they’re willing to pay.

“I actually don’t think there is anybody else who is allowing customers to name their own price,” says co-founder Dave Thawley, when asked about Bidzy’s competitors. “Or to put a credit card behind their bid… Bidzy is actually reaching out to the merchants on customers’ behalf, saying ‘hey are you free at two o’clock today, are you willing to cut my hair for $35?’ So we feel like we’re the first company to put the equation that way in the personal services space.”

There’s undoubtedly some crossover between Bidzy and Zaarly but Thawley argues that’s “more of a traditional storefront business versus the kind of marketplace that we are today.” Other rivals he cites are Craigslist and “vertical-specific online booking tools” – but, in the latter’s case, he points out that merchants have to provide availability data, something Bidzy does not require them to do.

The main knot Bidzy is trying to work out of the local business ecosystem is the amount of time and sweat it can take consumers to track down a service that suits, especially if they have a last-minute need for it — whether it’s a back massage after a sports injury, a quick haircut when a work meeting is cancelled, or an overlooked oil change before heading off on a road trip. Or a dog walker when you’re presenting on stage at Disrupt.

The idea for Bidzy was sparked after just such an incident. “One of the reasons why we chose to do the service category was based on personal experience where I had been out kite boarding in the day, hurt my back and it was 8PM,” says Thawley. “I was trying to find a massage studio to give me a back massage and I ended up having to call about 20 merchants before I finally found somebody.

Instead of a customer with a last-minute service requirement wasting time trying to track down a business that can fit them in, Bidzy’s platform lets them broadcast a request to relevant businesses in their area. All they have to do is wait for a merchant to accept their bid and the appointment is booked and paid for. For the consumer it’s a low hassle way of ticking tough-to-schedule items off a to-do list.

To make a Bidzy bid, a consumer enters five criteria: the category of service they’re looking for; how far they’re willing to travel; the time they have available for an appointment; the star rating of the business they want to use; and how much they are willing to pay. At launch, Bidzy is using an amalgamation of public-review data to generate its own star rating for businesses, but, as consumers conduct transactions through the platform, it will be able to feed its own data in.

Once the consumer’s bid is submitted, merchants who meet the customer’s requirements are pinged by Bidzy — and each one can decide if it is happy to accept the customer on their terms, with no obligation to do so. The first to accept gets the business. Bidzy will also be able to show customer data to merchants to help them make a decision on whether to accept a bid – such as how many bids the customer has submitted before, and the star ratings they have left.

Bidzy’s founders are keen to point out that, unlike daily deals companies like Groupon – which cast a long and rather chilling shadow over the local services space with their deal-driven customer acquisition model — Bidzy does not place margin-battering requirements on businesses to accept hundreds of customers at a particular offer price. Local merchants with modest means are able to choose to accept each potential sale on a case by case basis.

Click to view slideshow.

“A lot of the negativity from merchants towards Groupon is that you’re required to sell 200, 300, 400 appointments in a single Groupon deal,” says Thawley. “What that means for them is for a very long period of time – sometimes upwards of six months – they are just having a very challenging issue pushing all of these Groupon deals through their system without disrupting their traditional customer flow.”

So while Bidzy’s platform may inevitably encourage customers to haggle and perhaps try their luck at getting a discount price, it’s not a like-for-like competitor with daily deals since merchants retain control over whether they take on each new customer. For them it’s a zero risk, low hassle way to get new customers through the door at times when they specifically need them, increasing utilization rates and supplementing their normal cash flow. And at the end of the day, if a customer is trying their luck asking to pay too little, the merchant can just ignore them and wait for a better bid to drop in.

Having talked to plenty of services business in the course of setting up the business, Bidzy’s founders point out that most operate at less than full capacity at certain times of day – “lots operate at 50 percent utilization” overall, says Thawley. And that’s the pretty big business problem Bidzy is aiming to fix — as well as offering consumers a more convenient way to get stuff done. “Bidzy allows local services businesses to monetize what was previously un-utilized time, and to augment their existing customer base in a very bite-sized manor,” he says.

The startup is launching in one city — San Francisco — and targeting personal services categories including hair and beauty, nails, fitness, massage, automotive, and home and pet, which it believes are best suited to the last-minute service/convenience problem it’s aiming to crack. Once usage data starts flowing in it can of course look to adjust the categories it covers, based on where traction is and isn’t taking place.

“We’re the first people to acknowledge that it’s never going to be 100 percent of [local services] appointments going through the Bidzy platform,” says Bidzy’s other co-founder Sven Jensen. “There’s certain situations where people on the consumer side do want more control… The woman who’s going to get her haircut the morning of her marriage is probably going to want someone she’s spent a lot of time researching.”

But for every pre-wedding hair cut there are undoubtedly scores more consumers needing a quick short-back-and-sides on a quiet Tuesday afternoon. And that’s where Bidzy is positioning itself to take a percentage cut of all those extra transactions it makes possible.

Although it’s just the beginning for Bidzy’s platform — which today launches as an iOS app and website (an Android app due in six to eight weeks’ time) — the startup has managed to sign up around 15,000 merchants in the Bay Area already, with relatively minimal levels of merchant outreach (and no paying customers yet).

Thawley and Jensen, have been bootstrapping Bidzy to the tune of just $70,000, which makes its merchant acquisition efforts all the more impressive. Bidzy’s permanent headcount is currently just the two co-founders, although they have used contractors to help get the initial swathe of merchants signed up.

The founders met in San Francisco about five years ago, through another startup Jensen was working on, and started talking about setting up “a platform for what a buyer wants” early last year. They both have retail experience to draw on as they build out Bidzy. After a stint in the Air Force, Thawley headed to business school and went into business strategy consultancy — where eBay become a client. Jensen worked in investment banking before doing the sports equipment marketplace startup which is where he met Thawley.

After the buzz generated by launching at Disrupt, the founders say they intend to start looking to raise their first round — to build out the Bidzy team and technology, ramp up customer and merchant acquisition and start expanding geographically. Fittingly for Disrupt NY, New York is the next city on their roadmap, but they also see a lot of potential for Bidzy in less well-served parts of the U.S.

“We built our technology to have a very rapid rollout across the United States. And our hope is to go from San Francisco to New York, and once those two markets are operating comfortably we think a lot of the value is actually getting into middle America where a lot of these solutions are much less prevalent,” says Thawley. “We’ve got a very automated means of merchant outreach – we spent a lot of time building out our North American database – it’s stuff that should hopefully happen very quickly.”

Questions & Answers

Judges: Nikolaos Bonatsos (General Catalyst), Tracy Chou (Pinterest), Matt Mazzeo (Lowercase Capital), Ron Palmeri (MkII Ventures).

Q: How do you provide apples to apples comparisons of service providers who are used to providing services at different price points?
A: That’s mainly based on star rating. So if you are submitting a bid for a five star hair cut then that’s automatically going to be pushing out to the group of merchants who receive those ratings on traditional online ratings forms so when you submit your bid and if a merchant qualified it, based on their geolocation and their star rating, it’s actually the first merchant to accept the bid that earns your service. This is how Bidzy’s operating on day one. Further down the line — assuming we have merchants that are auto-accepting or accepting at a very fast rate then we’d use our own algorithm to decide what’s going to provide the best experience for the customer.

Q: What are the top use cases that you have in mind? What are the top three verticals?
A: I think different people are going to have different products that they use. Some people would be fine with getting a haircut and using Bidzy to get that last minute haircut when you need something quick and simple. Other people wouldn’t let us go near their hair but maybe something like a manicure, or maybe something like dog walking — or even something like getting your house or apartment cleaned — you as a customer think of more as a commoditised experience. Consumers can still set a star rating to have a level of quality assurance but the more commoditised the experience, the easier for the customer to get their head around it.

Q: One of the challenges is this is a classic two-sided market. You have to have enough providers, in order for people to find people that are willing to fulfil the bid. That’s usually a pretty hard problem to do so how are you tackling that?
A: It’s the chicken and egg problem but we think our chicken lays a lot of eggs. Speaking specifically to the merchant side, we’ve got two main answers to that: we’re offering them a customer at 2pm today whether they want it or not. On top of that, in order to reduce this friction and not have this problem of a lot of boots on the ground in order to sell Bidzy into these businesses we’ve developed a proprietary app that regardless of whether the merchant’s on our platform or not when you submit that bid for the oil change, every merchant in the local area receives a telephone call, an SMS and an email notifying them that this appointment’s available. And they can choose whether or not they log on to the Bidzy platform in order to find out more.

On the consumer side it’s a little bit more of a traditional playbook. We’ve got all of the normal social hooks built into our app  and our website. There’s Facebook and Twitter sharing. We already have a refer a friend program — if I tell you about it and you enter a code, I’m getting $10 to spend on my next bid.

Q: How far along is the company in terms of team, market, customers?
A: We’ve launched about three hours ago. So far the numbers are really through the roof! We’ve been developing for approx. 7 months. The business has been in place for 10. We spent first few months mainly doing research. The team right now is Sven & myself, as well as a team of contract developers but post-TechCrunch we’re hoping to raise a round of funding an build out a more significant sized in-house team. And then we’ve built out the technology to date so we can rapidly deploy across all U.S. cities although we’re launching today in San Francisco

Q: For the first time that somebody fires up the app how are you going to make sure that whatever that person requests, you’re going to be able to fulfil that?
A: We start off by making the customer put bids in our buckets. It’s not a Craiglist format where you can type in free-form text. The customer is pushed in an avenue to structure their data. There’s very few points where you get to put in unstructured data. There’s some bids that we’re never going to be able to offer — if you’re looking for something very specific at two o’clock in the morning and merchants aren’t working at that point. We’re not going to solve that problem; nor is anyone. But speaking to these merchants, a lot of them are small businesses, a lot of them are desperate — they’re working at about 50% capacity. We’re giving them a new channel to get a customer. They know how much they’re going to get, they didn’t have to do anything in advance of it and they get extra money.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Paidpiper Launches At Disrupt NY, Letting You Pay For Others’ Purchases In Stores

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,


okd_homescreen

Paidpiper launched at Disrupt NY today, aiming to make your physical wallet, and presence, less necessary — in a good way.

At the beginning of my freshman fall at Stanford I was wandering around campus with a lanyard around my neck buying books, a bike, a mini fridge and more. Not destined to be an accounting major, I forgot to check to make sure I had enough money in my account, so I had to wait for my mom to transfer money to me before I was able to buy an Intro to Humanities book that served as a top-notch coaster.

Paidpiper aims to solve that problem (not the education one) with its consumer-facing app, Ok’d. Using Ok’d, you can walk into a store, snap a picture of a product, and send it to a friend, parent, employer, etc. and ask them to pay for it.

The payer receives a request, complete with price, product information, and a chat function between requester and payer, all in real time. Once the payer approves the request, the requester gets a barcode on their Ok’d app that they show to the cashier.

Ok’d runs on the secure messaging payment platform built by Paidpiper, which works on the existing credit card payment rails to program one-time use cards. The funder decides where, when and what can be purchased, but doesn’t have to be physically in the store or give someone else their credit card information.

Paidpiper says the merchant doesn’t need any new hardware or software to accept payment via these one-time use cards, as they just have to enter the card number or scan the barcode. The company also says it takes care of security by leveraging the credit card rails and handles card issuance regulations and Money Transfer Licenses requirements to make things easier for merchants.

Paidpiper raised $1,200,000 in March 2012 from CrunchFund (founded by TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington), Blumberg Capital, and T5 Capital.

The company says you can send money to anyone, whether they have a bank account or not; as long as the recipient has a phone number, they can receive money via Paidpiper.

Paidpiper makes the cards redeemable only through the store where it is asked for, and every card has an expiration date, after which unspent money is automatically returned to the payer.

For now, the Ok’d pilot charges a service fee of up to 5 percent for every transaction. Ok’d is available now, and CEO and founder Atif Hussein tells me the company is now focusing on APIs to support Brands.

Hussein says the company believes every person naturally belongs to multiple networks, as small as our families and larger like followers of popular brands. Ok’d allows people to send and receive money in their small networks. Hussein says their goal is to drive measurable loyalty through fan-based foot traffic to brick-and-mortar stores in a highly curated, controlled way.

“What you saw was a platform to move money around safely and securley,” Hussein explained, concluding the Disrupt presentation. “We built the Ok’d application on top of that.”

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031