Tag Archive | "steve-jobs"

The Steve “jOBS” Biopic Will Finally Land In A Theater Near You On August 16

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


ashtonjobs

We’ve all been waiting restlessly for the release of the jOBS biopic, starring Ashton Kutcher as Steve Jobs, but dismay overtook us when we heard its April release date had been pushed back.

But fear not, you Jobsian fanbois, for Open Road has finally revealed that jOBS will see a nationwide release on August 16.

Word comes by way of The Wrap, which got the scoop last night, and official word came via Deadline.

Here’s the studio’s official statement:

Open Road Films will release JOBS – the highly anticipated film chronicling the story of Steve Jobs’ ascension from college dropout to one of the most revered creative entrepreneurs of the 20th century – nationwide on August 16, 2013. JOBS details the major moments and defining characters that influenced Steve Jobs on a daily basis from 1971 through 2001. The film plunges into the depths of his character, creating an intense dialogue-driven story that is as much a sweeping epic as it is an immensely personal portrait of Steve Jobs’ life. Directed by Joshua Michael Stern, written by Matthew Whiteley, JOBS was shot by Oscar-winning cinematographer Russell Carpenter and produced by Mark Hulme. JOBS stars Ashton Kutcher, Dermot Mulroney, Josh Gad, Lukas Haas, J.K. Simmons and Matthew Modine.

The movie has been in development since last year, and TechCrunch even got a sneak peek behind the scenes after Rip Empson made his way down to L.A. to be an extra on the set. Since then, the biopic has debuted at the Sundance Film Festival.

However, Open Road explained that its original April release date would have to be pushed back since the film wasn’t receiving enough hype to be released. In other words, expect to see jOBS biopic posters about as often as you see an article on the forthcoming iPhone over the summer.

Ashton Kutcher, part sexy actor and part Silicon Valley investor, reportedly took his role as Steve Jobs quite seriously. During the 1983 Keynote scene, wherein Jobs introduces the famous 1984 commercial, Kutcher was said to have been quite bossy, just like Steve likely was, and in-character the whole time.

He even went on Jobs’ fruitarian diet, forcing him into the hospital after trying to sustain himself on nuts and fruits alone.

But all’s well that ends well. Let’s just hope that critics and fans are less critical of the Jobs biopic then they are of a Jobs-less Apple.

[via TheVerge]

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Gillmor Gang: Cider House Rules

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


gillmor-gang-test-pattern_excerpt

The Gillmor Gang — Dan Farber, Robert Scoble, Kevin Marks, and Steve Gillmor — absorb the WWDC keynote. iOS7, OS/10 Mavericks, Macbook Air refresh, and iTunes Radio were the big bullets, but underlying the event was the resurgence of Apple as the leader in setting the agenda. Not everyone buys this perspective, of course. @scobleizer sees this as the assignment of RIM and Microsoft to the dustbin of history. But wait, there’s XBox.

@dbfarber provides the context, @kevinmarks the technopop view, and I watch from the comfort of my living room as Apple TV looms, the elephant in the room. 1080P HD straight into the living room, iOS7′s control panel makes AirPlay one scroll and click away. Apple no longer feels haunted by the ghost of Steve Jobs; they’re having fun again in Cupertino.

@stevegillmor, @scobleizer, @dbfarber, @kevinmarks

Produced and directed by Tina Chase Gillmor @tinagillmor

Live recording chat stream

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

CrunchWeek: Elon Musk Dominates Tech, Waze Sale Talks Falter (Again), Jury’s Out On Arrested Development

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Screen Shot 2013-06-01 at 9.40.26 AM

Thanks to the Memorial Day holiday, it was a shorter week than normal for many of us (at least those of us in the United States) — so here’s to the weekend, and to a new episode of CrunchWeek, the TechCrunch TV show where a few of us writers sit down for some real talk about the stories that dominated the tech world over the past seven days.

This time around, Leena Rao, Ryan Lawler and I discuss Elon Musk continuing to dominate the tech world’s attention with his moonshot business moves (and whether he’s the next Steve Jobs or even Thomas Edison), Waze’s acquisition talks reportedly breaking down — and how it’s not the first time that M&A talks have faltered for the startup in recent months, and whether Netflix’s Arrested Development debut was a win or a loss for thcompany (and Lawler’s kind of amazing interview with Mitch Hurwitz and Will Arnett from a few months back).

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Woz: Apple’s Share Price May Be Disappointing Now, But They Will Probably Surprise Us All

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


photo (14)

Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple with Steve Jobs, said today that Apple’s share price, which hit a 16-month low two days ago, is “disappointing” but that he was confident the tech giant would come out with products which would “surprise and shock us all.”

In a wide-ranging speech at the Login technology conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, Woz – as he is known – said: “[Apple's]stock price is a little low right now. Over time I’ve seen Apple go up or down 2x over a few months. It’s very disappointing because if you look at the amount of cash that Apples holds that cash translates to one to two hundred dollars per share of stock just in cash form. So the expectations are a little lower even than they expect.

“But where are the profits of the whole industry though? They are still with Apple and profits are all that really matter in the long run. Apple’s business model tends to be new products, even products that didn’t exist before and doing well out of them and not re-making the same thing, as eventually that just gets a little bit stale. So I would guess that Apple is very well prepared, and working on new things that are going to surprise and shock us all. And I honestly don’t know [what].”

In a wide-ranging speech to the conference, he envisioned a future where computers eventually become so powerful that they will deliver us “to a place of perfect happiness”. He said computers have already saved us from having to do a lot of manual work, but he also said it was a “good thing” that they would eventually take over a lot of our need to think. “Computers should save us from a lot of thinking, like calculating numbers. When electronic calculators came about they freed our minds to think of other things and enabled us to get to where we are today.”

He spoke about his hopes for voice recognition on smartphones becoming more powerful: “It’s almost there already. I use it all the time. I would expect voice [recognition interfaces] to become more common.”

He said the main obstacle faced by computing today was the sheer complexity of hardware devices due to miniaturization and in order to break out and create a new kind of computer “someone would have to start from the ground up.”

He also reminisced about his time with Steve Jobs and hacking together hardware projects for friends.

“The iPhone 5 is one of the hottest products today. Back then, the HP35 hand-held calculator was the iPhone 5 of its day.”

Woz is also hoping for a robot which could “clean my car at night in the garage” – although he didn’t imply Apple might be building such a thing.

“I gave up trying to guess [what Apple would do next] a long time ago. There can be rumors which are false, or something gets cancelled. I never ask key insiders at Apple what they are about to come out with.”

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Funny Or Die’s Steve Jobs Movie Trailer Looks To Strike A Perfect Balance Of All Hype, No Substance

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


isteve-justin-long-funny-or-die

Steve Jobs was a rare CEO in that he inspired myths and legends not just among employees, but also among the general public. An executive whose name is recognizable to people not involved in his industry is a rarity, and believe it or not, Funny or Die’s upcoming iSteve biopic may be the movie that best captures his exaggerated, cartoonish public reputation.

Funny or Die has released a first teaser trailer for the film, which spans between 60 and 75 minutes and yet was shot in just five days, and the first look is basically a montage of every cliché, buzzword and melodramatic (and possibly fictional) turning point in the life of Steve Jobs and the history of Apple. It almost looks like the famous Reality Distortion Field made into a movie, which in many ways might be more appropriate than a belabored, intense, wordy drama like the one we’ll get from Sorkin, or the equally mythical by less fun take from the team behind the Kutcher iJobs flick.

The iSteve movie debuts April 15, and already enters the record books as the longest film project ever produced by Funny or Die. Based on this trailer, it looks like the script, which took three days to write, has a lot going for it, but it’s hard to lampoon something consistently for over an hour, so I’ll reserve judgement until I can finally see how well they’ve actually pulled it off.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Jack Dorsey Fights Robots In His Own Unauthorized Comic Book

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Jack Cover

He might not be bulletproof, but simultaneously running Twitter and Square qualifies Jack Dorsey as a superhero. This week a new unauthorized comic book about him was released, called “Jack Dorsey: Co-Founder of Twitter #1″. Check out these page scans posted by Comic Book Resources that preview his quest to recover stolen quantum networking technology.

In the first issue from BlueWater Productions now available on Kindle, Dorsey hunts for the kidnapped inventor of the futuristic computer chip that could power “the Internet’s next evolution.” Along the way are plenty of cheesy, dumbed-down references to how Twitter and Square are changing the world.

There are also some subtle references to Jack’s quirky personality, like his preference for taking the bus, plus a goofy scene where he mind-melds with a bison. Oh, and he battles a robot spider.

Dorsey isn’t the only tech superstar immortalized in a graphic novel. BlueWater has also made comic books about Steve JobsMark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, and Google co-founders Larry and Sergey. It all might seem ridiculous, but who would you rather have kids looking up to? Fictional caped crusaders? Or real inventors and entrepreneurs?

Images via Comic Book Resources.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Steve Wozniak, Speaking To The Denver Apple Pi Club In 1984, On College Pranks, Building The Apple I & II, And The Apple Pledge Of Allegiance

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


vincepattonvideowoz

“I pledge allegiance to the logo of corporate marketing in Cupertino. And to the computers for which it stands: One notion, under Jobs, indispensable, for hardware and software for all.” Steve Wozniak, to the Denver Apple Pi Computer Club in 1984.

And that video above is just a funny anecdotes. TUAW reader Vince Patton pointed the Apple fan site to 14 insightful videos he uploaded to YouTube of Steve Wozniak talking to the Denver Apple Pi Club in 1984. As TUAW notes, they’re a treasure trove of first hand accounts into the formation of Apple, the creation of the Apple I and II, and Woz’s college antics.

Apparently Patton recently discovered his father’s VHS taping of Woz’s talk to Denver Apple Pi computer club at the Colorado School of Mines on October 4, 1984. He cleaned up the recording and uploaded 14 clips to YouTube. Two of the best are embedded here but they’re all worth watching.

On the Apple II’s creation

“The computer [the Apple II] was not being design to be a product and it was not being design to be sold, nearly as much as it was being designed to impress and do some very unusual things that had not been seen before.” Steve Wozniak

Ironically, when speaking about the Apple II’s integrated hardware, Wozniak brings up a point that Apple still abides by today, “Whenever you can recognized standards that will prevail, build them in.” By doing so in the Apple II, this allowed Apple to leave slots open for future hardware, or as Woz says, “for expansion beyond what we can think of.”

Looking at Apple’s past hardware, this is a notion the company still believes in. From the early iMac’s use of USB over serial to the 10-year life of the Dock Connector, Apple cautiously approaches emerging standards, but tends to invest early and sticks with standards more than most other consumer electronic companies. Apparently it has been that way from the start.

Steve Jobs on the formation of Apple

“Yeah, we’d lose our money, but at least we would have a company.” said Steve Jobs according to Woz.

As Wozniak states, this was reason enough to sell bare PC boards and run the possibility of losing money — just so they would be involved in a company. And so the two, along with Ron Wayne who designed the manual, began selling the Apple I personal computer kit in 1976.

Woz explains there was originally three employees with him and Jobs owning 45% of the company. The remaining 10% went to Ron Wayne, who designed the Apple I manuals. He got cold feet several weeks into the venture and sold his 10% stake in Apple for $800. He received an additional $1,500 later that year in exchange for forfeiting any claims against the company. Given Apple’s current value, Wayne’s 10 percent share would have been worth more than $43 billion today.

Brian Heater profiled Wayne for Engadget in 2011. It’s a fantastic read.


All 14 videos are on Vince Patton’s YouTube account.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

There Was That Whole Internet Thing, Too

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Anyone wanting to see the whole “history is written by the victors” thing in process should read Tim Wu and John Gruber battle it out over exactly why Apple has kicked the crap out of everyone else since the late 90s.

Wu, who’s confused about what open v. closed systems really mean (he uses a variety of definitions), says that Apple has succeeded despite being a closed system. Gruber says open v. closed doesn’t matter, and says Apple succeeds because it produces great products fast (meaning first to market). Gruber’s argument can be condensed down to “Companies run by geniuses should generally do better than those which are not,” and I agree.

Except.

The internet.

Talking about Apple v. Microsoft without mentioning the internet and the browser is like talking about WWII without talking about the nuke. Framing the conversation just in terms of open v. closed operating systems, the quality of the hardware or software or who the CEO was, is silly.

Because without the internet happening there’s no way Apple would have succeeded.

Before the internet all most people cared about was Office. And Office was really the only reason anyone wanted Windows machines instead of Macs.

I remember endless Apple v. Windows debates in the early 90s when I was in college. Macs were better machines, everyone said, the whole Office thing was a huge pain. It was difficult to transfer files between operating systems, and generally speaking if you wanted to do Office stuff you needed a Windows machine. Macs were for college kids doing graphics stuff. Windows machines were for grown ups.

That all changed in the mid 90′s of course. But before people bought computers primarily to get on the Internet Apple was hurting badly. Market share was so bad there was even a question about whether Microsoft would even continue making Office for Mac.

Then everything came together for Apple at roughly the same time. Steve Jobs came back in 1997. He got Microsoft to recommit to Office on the Mac. From Wikipedia:

At the 1997 Macworld Expo, Steve Jobs announced that Apple would be entering into a partnership with Microsoft. Included in this was a five-year commitment from Microsoft to release Microsoft Office for Macintosh as well as a US$150 million investment in Apple. As part of the deal Apple and Microsoft agreed to settle a long-standing dispute over whether Microsoft’s Windows operating system infringed on any of Apple’s patents.[47] It was also announced that Internet Explorer would be shipped as the default browser on the Macintosh. Microsoft chairman Bill Gates appeared at the expo on-screen, further explaining Microsoft’s plans for the software they were developing for Mac, and stating that he was very excited to be helping Apple return to success. After this, Steve Jobs said this to the audience at the expo:

“If we want to move forward and see Apple healthy and prospering again, we have to let go of a few things here. We have to let go of this notion that for Apple to win, Microsoft has to lose. We have to embrace a notion that for Apple to win, Apple has to do a really good job. And if others are going to help us that’s great, because we need all the help we can get, and if we screw up and we don’t do a good job, it’s not somebody else’s fault, it’s our fault. So I think that is a very important perspective. If we want Microsoft Office on the Mac, we better treat the company that puts it out with a little bit of gratitude; we like their software. So, the era of setting this up as a competition between Apple and Microsoft is over as far as I’m concerned. This is about getting Apple healthy, this is about Apple being able to make incredibly great contributions to the industry and to get healthy and prosper again.”

But more important than any of this, was the Internet. Back then Office was the first software I’d install on a computer, and a computer without Office wasn’t fully a computer. I haven’t even bothered to install Office on my last two computers at all.

So as important as Office was in 1997, what really changed the game for Apple was the internet. Accessed via the most important virtual machine/operating system in our lifetimes, the browser, it completely leveled the playing field.

Suddenly computers weren’t entirely about Office, they were now about Office and the internet. Mac had only a slightly hobbled version of Office, and they had a peachy internet experience. As the internet matured and browsers became better the “problems” lessened significantly. A half decade ago Office became unimportant enough, and compatibility was good enough between Mac and Windows, that it became a non issue entirely.

The rise of the internet and the fall of Office is why Apple won. Or rather it gave them the opportunity to compete on a level playing field, and all the wonderful things about Apple were able to finally influence people into actually buying them. The world went from “I’d much rather have a Mac, but Office is too important” to “I’d much rather have a Mac but the damned things are too expensive.”

Post-Office but pre-internet Apple struggled. Post-internet, Apple won (because the playing field leveled and then, but only then, all the things Gruber says). It’s so obvious everyone forgets.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Why Did Tim Cook Talk At The Goldman Sachs Conference Anyway?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Tim Cook On Stage At Goldman Sachs Conference

Editor’s note: Howard Lindzon is co-founder and CEO of StockTwits, a social network for traders and investors to share real-time ideas and information. You can read his full bio here and find him on Twitter @howardlindzon.

Earlier today Josh Constine wrote that Apple Doesn’t Care, That’s Why They are Winning.

Hold the iPhone. Stop the iTablets. Apple does care. They cared enough to show up at The Goldman Sachs Conference. I would argue they are caring in the wrong places. There is just NO good reason Tim Cook should be speaking at a Goldman Conference.

Goldman employees use Blackberries, not for any great reason. They hide their iPhones and iPads at home. The great Goldman Sachs firewall is not his friend. Good luck using Apple products and software or social sharing products at a financial firm.

Tim knows this because Steve Jobs used to send him to this conference. Today, Tim is the boss and does not need to be there. I think it would send a reasonable statement of leadership strength and style that Steve Jobs himself would understand.

The hedge funds in attendance today have not been Apple’s friend. They did not make Apple great. En masse, they just panicked and chased the stock at $500 (up to $700) per share. Now they want some cash back. They are led by David Einhorn, no doubt a genius hedge fund manager, who is now suing Apple for the cash.

I cringe when Wall Street gets catered to in the era of “Social Leverage.” No long-lasting bump comes from this conference for $AAPL (I do hope I am wrong).

I would argue that Tim would be better off asking Goldman questions: “What was your indictment-per-employee growth since 2008?”

Tim should be doing town hall meetings (terrible term, but you get my drift). Bloggers should be reporting on random sightings at Apple Genius Bars every weekend. Tim should be shaking hands and talking to the customers at ground level. Talking about the products and the way they manage the “globalness” of it all. We miss Steve, too…yada yada yada.

No wonder the stock is down $11 today (about $10 billion). The people are voting and leaning on the stock. Sure, we worry about anyone managing that amount of cash because the truth is, no one has ever done well managing that amount of cash.

Tim, you have great hearing but you are not listening.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

Foundation: Jawbone’s Founder Hosain Rahman On How to Build Meaningful Hardware Prototypes

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Screen Shot 2013-02-05 at 11.13.33 PM

In this episode of my Foundation video series, I talk with Jawbone CEO and Founder Hosain Rahman. Hosain and I discuss the entrepreneurial environment at Stanford in the 1990’s, The Jetsons as design inspiration, and how his meeting with Steve Jobs shaped the future of Jawbone’s first product designs.

Hosain Rahman on Silicon Valley’s respect for founders:

“The optimism in ‘99 for ideas was incredible. It was unbridled. That optimism turned to darkness for years. I tell entrepreneurs now that it was not a founder-friendly Valley at all. ‘Come up with an idea as a founder, make it, and we’ll take it, thank you very much. We’ll hire a team, and you guys can hang out in the back somewhere.’

It was really frankly Steve Jobs and a few people like that, even [Mark Zuckerberg], who changed the course for how the investment community viewed founders running companies. You could build these great companies if you could help these guys become great managers and great leaders of businesses. I think that has been a wonderful transformation in the industry.”

Kevin Rose is a general partner at Google Ventures. You can watch Kevin’s prior Foundation episode, an interview with Dave Morin, CEO of Path, here.

Article courtesy of TechCrunch

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930